Legal Opinion

City of Landrum v. Sarratt

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided November 18, 2002No. 3569Published

1Opinion of the Court

352 S.C. 139 (2002)

572 S.E.2d 476

CITY OF LANDRUM, Appellant,

v.

Michael James SARRATT, Respondent.

No. 3569.

Court of Appeals of South Carolina.

Heard September 18, 2002.

Decided November 18, 2002.

Harold Lloyd Howard, of Landrum, for Appellant.

Ricky Keith Harris, of Spartanburg, for Respondent.

CURETON, J.:

Michael J. Sarratt was charged with public disorderly conduct. Sarratt waived his right to a jury trial and requested a bench trial. The municipal judge convicted Sarratt and ordered him to pay a fine of $112 or serve 20 days imprisonment. Sarratt appealed to the circuit court. The circuit court…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Chaplinsky v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Cohen v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Texas v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. City of Houston v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Gooding v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API