Legal Opinion

Lucking's adm'r v. Gegg

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided September 25, 1876PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Case 16 — PETITION ORDINARY APPEAL FROM JEFFERSON COMMON PLEAS COURT. CITED 6 Bush, 687, Gray, &c. v. Briscoe. 22 Howard, 118, Brewster v. Wakefield. CITED 1 Met. 600, Trabue’s ex’r v. Harris. 1 Met. 25, Rogers v. Mitchell. 10 Bush, 483, Howard’s adm’r v. Leavell’s adm’x. 15 B. Mon. 184, Thomas v. Thomas.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Lindsay

May 16, 1872, Boes and Lucking, who were partners, with Gegg as their surety, executed to Heneberger their promissory note, due one year from date, for the sum of $1,500, with interest from date at the rate of eight per cent per annum. Lucking died before the maturity of the note.

In August, 1875, the payee brought an action to enforce the collection of his debt. Boes and Gegg and the personal representative of Lucking were all made defendants. Lucking’s administrator interposed a defense, and before it could be disposed of judgment was rendered against Boes and Gegg.

Without objection Gegg,…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Batson v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1998
  2. Hill v. Cornwall & Bro.'s AssigneeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1894
  3. Terrell v. RowlandCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1887
  4. Batson v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API