Enos v. Sun Insurance Co.
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Sacramento County, and from an order refusing a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Foote, C.
Action on a fire insurance policy. The plaintiff had judgment for the amount claimed; the defendant moved for a new trial, which was denied. From the order made therein and the judgment, an appeal was taken. The case was tried by a jury.
One of the questions involved in it was, whether or not the fishing scow, which was insured, was in the policy of insurance included in the word “ building,” and thereby affected by all the terms and conditions of the policy as a building. The' *622defendant contended that it was so included, and that therefore it being unoccupied both at the time it was…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Shuggart v. Lycoming Fire Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1880
- Gladding v. Cal. Farmers' Mut. Fire Ins. Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
- McCormick v. Springfield Fire & Marine Ins. Co.California Supreme Court · 1885
- Silverberg v. Phenix Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1885
3Cited by16 opinions
- Farnum v. Phoenix InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Hankins v. Rockford Insurance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1887
- Kahn v. Traders InsuranceWyoming Supreme Court · 1893
- MacKintosh v. Agricultural Fire Ins. Co.California Supreme Court · 1907
- Connecticut Fire Insurance Co. v. RobertsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.