Legal Opinion

Pike v. Hauptman

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided January 9, 1909No. 15,392PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from the district court for Saline county: Leslie G. I-Iurd, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Duffie, C.

Action upon a promissory note given in part payment for a team of horses. The defense was breach of warranty. A full statement of the issues made by the pleadings will be found in the opinion of Mr. Commissioner Albert, Hauptman v. Pike, 77 Neb. 105. Plaintiff recovered in the district court, and defendant has appealed.

The only errors alleged by appellant arise from a blemish upon one of the horses, which defendant claims was a *173spavin. On the former trial one Ojers was a witness for the plaintiff. February 20, 1907, plaintiff caused a subpoena to issue for said Ojers, which was…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Skike v. PotterNebraska Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Barr v. PostNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Sellars v. FosterNebraska Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Wittenberg v. MollyneauxNebraska Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Phelps v. FootSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1815

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Exchange Elevator Co. v. MarshallNebraska Supreme Court · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API