Legal Opinion
Hawthorne v. Universal Studios, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided December 6, 1988No. C6-88-1008PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HUSPENI, Judge.
Relator Charles Hawthorne, a former employee of respondent Universal Studios, Inc., seeks review of a determination that he did not have good cause attributable to Universal to quit his job. We reverse and remand for more specific findings.
FACTS
Charles Hawthorne began working for Universal Studios, Inc. (“Universal”) in October 1985. His position involved manufacturing stained glass windows.
Hawthorne received a paycheck each Friday for work performed that same week. Prior to February 28, 1986, if he worked over 40 hours during a week, Hawthorne was paid his regular wage…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- White v. Metropolitan Medical CenterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Lisa Marz v. Department of Employment ServicesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Zepp v. Arthur Treacher Fish & Chips, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- Hanson v. I. D. S. Properties Management Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- Talberg v. Commissioner of Economic SecurityCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Grunow v. WALSER AUTOMOTIVE GROUP LLCCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010
- Gorr v. Sheridan Travels, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
- Charles Lambert Bey, Relator v. W.W. Johnson Meat Co., Inc., Department of Employment and Economic DevelopmentCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014
- Hawthorne v. Universal Studios, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988