Legal Opinion

City of Chicago v. Rumsey

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1877PublishedCited by 30 opinions

Appeal from, the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. John G. Rogers, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Scholfield

This is an action on the case, by Julian S. Rumsey against the City of Chicago, for damages alleged to have been sustained to real estate in consequence of the construction of a tunnel under the Chicago river, in La Salle street.

The city was empowered, by legislative authority, to construct the tunnel. An ordinance directing its construction was duly adopted by the common council, and the work was done by a contractor, pursuant to plans, profiles and specifications of the city, and under the direction and supervision of its engineer, with all reasonable dispatch, skill and care. Mo claim is…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Nevins v. City of PeoriaIllinois Supreme Court · 1866
  2. City of Quincy v. JonesIllinois Supreme Court · 1875
  3. Board of Trustees v. HavenIllinois Supreme Court · 1850
  4. Moses v. Pittsburgh, Fort Wayne & Chicago RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1859
  5. Murphy v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1862

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Cicero Lumber Co. v. Town of CiceroIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Johnson v. City of ParkersburgWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Mason v. Harper's Ferry Bridge Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1880
  4. The People v. Deep Rock Oil Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1931
  5. People v. DeanIllinois Supreme Court · 1997

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API