Legal Opinion

Sutherland v. Keene

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided January 7, 1947PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcAMIS, J.

In these two cases, growing out of an automobile collision and tried together below, the defend ant, Mrs. F. M. Sutherland, has appealed in error and assigned errors raising as the principal grounds for reversal the kinship of one of the jurors to plaintiff, Jack Keene, and that the jury improperly discussed, and were improperly influenced by, the possibility that Mrs. Sutherland carried public liability insurance on her automobile. Other assignments raise the question that the verdict, even as reduced by remittitur suggested by the trial judge, is excessive; that the undisputed proof shows…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Reeves v. CatignaniTennessee Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railway v. WhiteTennessee Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Thomason v. TrenthamTennessee Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Lunn v. EalyTennessee Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Hamilton v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1898

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. City of Winchester v. FinchumTennessee Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Adams v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1953
  3. France v. NewmanCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1951
  4. City Water Co. v. ButlerCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1951
  5. Chandler v. NolenCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1961

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API