Legal Opinion
United States v. H. Bradford Aarons
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided October 5, 1983No. 82-1396PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Per curiam
H. Bradford Aarons appeals his conviction, following a lengthy jury trial in the Eastern District of Michigan, on a single count of making, or causing to be made, a false statement to an agency of the United States, 18 U.S.C. §§ 1001 and 2. Finding the evidence insufficient to support the conviction, we reverse. 1
Production Forming, Inc. (PFI) borrowed $385,000 from the Madison National Bank of Detroit, Michigan (Bank). The lender and the lendee applied to the Small Business Administration (SBA) for the usual guaranty it may make of such loans. A part of that application was a document…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Hoffa v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Pereira v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- United States v. GillilandSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- United States v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Richard Joseph, Petitioner-Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Ralph Coyle, Warden, Respondent-Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
- United States v. Joseph ArnoldCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- Eric Scott Patterson v. Thomas B. Haskins, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
- United States v. Anthony Bruno, Angelo Cerasulo, John Imbrieco, Mario Fortunato and Carmine PolitoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
- United States v. Calvin L. QuinnCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.