Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Claypool

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided March 27, 1959No. 12,323PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

GEORGE W. Latimer, Judge:

The accused was convicted on four specifications of pandering, three specifications alleging receipt of payment for the services performed, and one specification of false swearing, all in violation of Article 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 934. He was sentenced to a bad-conduct discharge, total forfeitures, and confinement at hard labor for one year. A board of review approved all findings of guilty except the one involving the offense of false swearing. After disapproving the one finding, it reassessed the sentence, reducing the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. SamuelsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1959
  2. United States v. AronsonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1957
  3. United States v. WashingtonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1958
  4. United States v. GeibUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1958
  5. United States v. OsborneUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1958

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. United States v. GiordanoUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1964
  2. United States v. JohannsU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1983
  3. United States v. FretwellUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1960
  4. United States v. McCarthyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1960
  5. United States v. SimpsonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1967

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API