Legal Opinion

Martin v. Riehl

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1899PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Action for dissolution of a copartnership and for an accounting. Pacts .appear in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtGildersleeve, J.

This is an action for the dissolution of an alleged partnership, and for an accounting. The answer denies any partnership. The testimony appears to establish the following state of facts,. viz.: The plaintiff and defendant entered into an agreement, by which plaintiff was to procure from the United Brotherhood of Tanners & Curriers of America the privilege of publishing the official report and manual for 1894 of said’ association. The defendant was to publish the said work at his own expense and risk, and was to pay to .the plaintiff 80 per cent. ^ of the net profits, besides paying him 25…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bickford v. SearlesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
  2. Lansburgh v. WalshNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1895

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bradley v. WolffNew York Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Hunt v. McCabeNew York Supreme Court · 1903

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API