Legal Opinion

State v. El

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided October 3, 1985No. 22380PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Appellant was convicted of forgery and sentenced. We affirm.

Appellant argues that the trial judge erroneously limited his closing argument to twenty minutes when he requested thirty minutes. He asserts that under S. C. Code Ann. § 40-5-330 (1976) and Article I, § 14, of the South Carolina Constitution he was entitled to argue for two hours as a matter of right. Therefore, he contends that the judge had no authority to refuse his request for thirty minutes. We disagree.

Section 40-5-330 limits oral argument to a maximum of two hours unless the trial judge authorizes additional time. This…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. BallengerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1943
  2. State v. BlackstoneSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1920

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Roof v. KimbroughCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API