Holman v. Holman
Supreme Court of Louisiana
1Opinion of the Court
FOURNET, Chief Justice.
The plaintiff, Dr. Winston Churchill Holman, is appealing from the judgment of the district court refusing to modify the alimony award granted his former wife, Mrs. Freddie Earle Newsome Holman, for the support of their minor son, Winston Churchill Holman II, by reducing the same from $200 to $60 a month.
It appears from the record in this case (as well as from other records that are in this court by reason of former appearances of these parties here), that Dr. Holman, who married the defendant in 1943, instituted suit for separation against her in January of 1948,…
2Cited by12 opinions
- Zara v. ZaraLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1967
- Baer v. SimonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1976
- Harris v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1969
- Vestal v. VestalLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1968
- Cenac v. PowerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1968
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.