Legal Opinion

Fitzgerald v. Williams

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided May 19, 1961No. 2717PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOOD, Associate Judge.

Appellants, members of the Bar, were counsel for Mrs. Williams in an action by her for a divorce. Before the action was reached for trial Mrs. Williams died. Thereafter appellants filed a motion to compel Mr- Williams to pay them counsel fees for services rendered in the action prior to the death of their client. The trial court ruled that it had no power to grant the relief requested; and we think it was correct in so ruling.

Our statute provides: “During the pen-dency of a suit for divorce, * * * the court shall have power to require the husband to pay alimony to the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Boardman v. CareyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1933
  2. Bailey v. ScottCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1927
  3. Martin v. MartinCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1927

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Meyers & Batzell v. MoezieDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1965
  2. Thunberg v. ThunbergDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1971
  3. Drucker v. DruckerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1971
  4. Edgil v. RagsdillSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API