Legal Opinion
Slimp v. Sartisky
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided September 17, 2012No. Nos. 2011-CA-1677, 2011-CA-1820PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MAX N. TOBIAS, JR., Judge.
|,Marjorie Slimp (“Slimp”), the defendant/appellant, has filed these consolidated appeals from the judgments rendered by the trial court below. Michael Sartisky (“Sartisky”), the plaintiff/appellee/cross-ap-pellant, has answered, seeking a modification of the judgment addressing the partition and reimbursements. After reviewing the record and applicable law, we affirm in part, reverse in part, and render judgment.
Slimp and Sartisky were in a romantic relationship for many years, each owning their own home. In 2001, the parties decided to sell their respective homes…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Rosell v. EscoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1989
- Burguieres v. PollingueSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2003
- Amend v. McCabeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1995
- McCrory v. Terminix Service Co., Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1992
- Johnson v. KTBS, INC.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2004
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Board of Supervisors v. Dixie Brewing Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2016
- Olson v. OlsonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2016
- Bruce A. O'krepki, Independent of the Succession of Richard E. O'Krepki v. Penelope Brodtmann O'Krepki C/W Succession of Richard E. O'KrepkiSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2026
- Gettys v. GettysLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2018
- Jackson v. MortonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2018
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.