Legal Opinion
Sweeny Hospital District v. Carr
Texas Supreme Court
Decided April 22, 1964No. A-9845PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CALVERT, Chief Justice-
Relator, the Sweeny Hospital District, seeks a writ of mandamus requiring the Attorney General to approve certain construction and improvement bonds which the dis trict proposes to issue under authority of Article 4494qT13. 1 The writ is conditionally granted.
By an election held in the district on June 22, 1963, the majority of those voting voted for two separate propositions. The first proposition submitted creation of the Sweeny Hospital District with authority to levy annual taxes not to exceed seventy-five cents on the one hundred dollar valuation of all taxable…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Halbert v. San Saba Springs Land & Live Stock Ass'nTexas Supreme Court · 1896
- King v. Carlton Independent School DistrictTexas Supreme Court · 1956
- Roby v. HawthorneCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
- City of Richmond v. AllredTexas Supreme Court · 1934
- Winters v. Independent School Dist. of EvantCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1918
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- State v. Shoppers World, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1964
- Mauzy v. Legislative Redistricting BoardTexas Supreme Court · 1971
- Moore v. Edna Hospital DistrictCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1969
- Board of Managers of the Harris County Hospital District v. Pension Board of the Pension System for the City of HoustonTexas Supreme Court · 1969
- City of Corpus Christi v. HerschbachCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1976
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.