Legal Opinion · Dissent

State Ex Rel. Commissioners of Land Office v. Laughlin

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 7, 1954No. 36124Published

1DissentDavison, Justice

I cannot concur in the reasoning or the conclusion reached in the majority opinion in the above styled case. In dissenting, I feel that I should express the reasons for by position.

Simply stated, House Joint Resolution No. 508, 1953 S.L. 513, 64 O.S.Supp.1953 § 82.2, provides for satisfaction and release of deficiency judgments in favor of the Commissioners of the Land Office, by the payment of the unpaid principal of said judgment plus. interest thereon at the rate of 5% per annum from the date of rendition of said judgment. , The practical effect of the act is the remittance of all interest…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Com'rs of Land Office v. WeemsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1946
  2. City of McAlester v. JonesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  3. State ex rel. Com'rs of Land Office v. FroeseSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1948
  4. Holliman v. ColeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  5. State ex rel. Com'rs of Land Office v. CollinsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API