Legal Opinion

Becker v. Northland Transportation Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 18, 1937No. 31,146PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion

This court granted a rehearing on the question of independent contractor as it relates to the defendant Haturi. It is the plaintiff's contention that Maturi is liable for the negligence of Stokke, even though the contract was an independent one, because Maturi should have realized that the burning of the brush necessarily created conditions involving an unreasonable risk to others unless special precautions were taken; and that he failed to provide in the contract, or in some other manner, that such precautions should be taken. The plaintiff also contends that Maturi did not exercise…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Robbins v. Chicago CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1867
  2. City & Suburban Railway Co. v. MooresCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1894
  3. Callahan v. Salt Lake CityUtah Supreme Court · 1912

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Becker v. Northland Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API