Legal Opinion
Jewel Tea Company v. Florida Industrial Commission
Supreme Court of Florida
Decided May 27, 1970No. 38281, 38282PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
235 So.2d 289 (1969)
JEWEL TEA COMPANY, Inc., Petitioner,
v.
FLORIDA INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION and Arthur Hoagey, Respondents.
Arthur HOAGEY, Petitioner,
v.
JEWEL TEA COMPANY, Inc., and Florida Industrial Commission, Respondents.
Nos. 38281, 38282.
Supreme Court of Florida.
November 25, 1969.
On Rehearing May 27, 1970.
Billy L. Rowe of Harrison, Greene, Mann, Davenport, Rowe & Stanton, St. Petersburg, for Jewel Tea Co., petitioner-respondent.
Dewey A. Dye of Dye, Dye, Smith, Cleary & Scott, and W. Robert Mann, of Knowles, Mann & Blalock, Bradenton, for Arthur Hoagey, respondent-petitioner.
Patrick H. Mears…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cited by20 opinions
- Barragan v. City of MiamiSupreme Court of Florida · 1989
- City of Hollywood v. LombardiSupreme Court of Florida · 2000
- Brown v. SS Kresge Company, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1974
- Marion Correctional Inst. v. KriegelDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
- City of Miami v. BellDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.