Legal Opinion

Mitchell v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 9, 1989No. 88-1467PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

This is a timely appeal from a conviction and sentence after a jury trial in which appellant was found guilty of the lesser-included offense of trespass on count I and guilty of possession of a burglary tool in count II. Count I had originally been charged as attempted burglary of a dwelling. Prior to appellant’s trial, the state filed notice of intent to seek enhanced penalties under the habitual offender statute should defendant be found guilty.

Sections 775.084(l)(a), (3), and (4), Florida Statutes (1987), contain the pertinent provisions of the habitual offender statute. Sections…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. King v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API