Thompson v. Niggley
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from Marshall District Court. Action by Thompson and another against Niggley and wife to recover on a note and mortgage. Judgment for the defendants at the February term, 1890. The plaintiffs bring the case here. The opinion states the facts.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Allen, J.:
N. B. Thompson and H. F. Talbot, as partners, brought suit on a note executed by Michael Niggley and Fannie Niggley, his wife, for $1,250, payable to Rudolph Summers, and to foreclose mortgages given to secure the same. The plaintiffs claimed to be purchasers of the note and mortgages from Summers. The defendants, in their answer, admit the execution of the note and mortgages, but allege that they were without consideration, and were obtained by fraud and duress. It appears that Michael Niggley kept a billiard saloon in Waterville; that late…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Taylor v. JaquesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
- Compton v. Bunker Hill BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1880
- Buchanan v. SahleinMissouri Court of Appeals · 1881
- Seiber v. PriceMichigan Supreme Court · 1873
- Davis v. LusterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1876
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Williamson v. AckermanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1908
- Meyer v. Guardian Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1924
- Glenney v. CraneCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1962
- Western Paving Co. v. SifersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1928
- Clifford v. Great Falls Gas Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1923
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.