Legal Opinion

Garland v. Garland

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 12, 2004PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In a family offense proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 8, the husband appeals from an order of protection of the Family Court, Queens County (Richroath, J.), dated November 20, 2002, which, after a hearing and upon a finding that he committed family offenses within the meaning of Family Court Act § 812, directed, inter alia, that he stay 500 feet away from the petitioner, her residence, and her place of employment until November 20, 2003.

Ordered that the order of protection is reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, and the proceeding is dismissed.

Although the order…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cavanaugh v. MaddenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  2. Hogan v. HoganAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  3. London v. BlazerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Hasbrouck v. HasbrouckAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  2. Patton v. TorresAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  3. Aruti v. ArutiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  4. Foxworth v. DeJesusAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  5. Ungar v. UngarAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API