Legal Opinion · Dissent

People v. Simac

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided November 3, 1992No. 2-90-1420Published

1DissentJustice Geiger

I agree with the majority that the preferred procedure for defense counsel to have followed in this case would have been to advise the court, in advance of the trial, that he would not have the defendant seated at the counsel table. Nevertheless, despite counsel’s belated revelation to the court, I would not find that the evidence supported a conviction of direct criminal contempt. Thus, I must respectfully dissent.

In this case, the record does not contain any court rule which required the defendant to be seated at the counsel table. Likewise, the record does not indicate any direct…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. MorganIllinois Supreme Court · 1991
  2. People v. MillerIllinois Supreme Court · 1972
  3. People v. L.A.S.Illinois Supreme Court · 1986
  4. People v. KuelperAppellate Court of Illinois · 1977
  5. People v. PensonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1990

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API