Kline v. Emmele

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Hatcher, C.:

This appeal covers two separate actions resulting from a collision between two automobiles. One action was by the driver of the automobile for damages as the result of personal injuries sustained. In the other action the owner of the automobile driven by the injured party seeks property damages for injury to the automobile. The two cases were consolidated.

The plaintiffs sought recovery under the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur. The facts are not in serious dispute.

*630The plaintiff, Norman B. Kline, was driving his father’s Chevrolet automobile…