Legal Opinion

Prendergast v. Patel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 13, 2003PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—In *509an action to recover damages for medical malpractice, etc., the plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Ponterio, J.), dated October 30, 2001, as, upon a jury verdict, is in favor of the defendants Mukund R. Patel and Orthopaedic Surgical Associates and against them dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against those defendants.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Contrary to the plaintiffs’ contention, the Supreme Court properly precluded their counsel from questioning the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. SchwartzmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
  2. Coopersmith v. GoldNew York Court of Appeals · 1997
  3. People v. MagrigorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Perkins v. MurphyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  2. Doran v. McNultyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  3. Georgescu v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  4. Perry v. Kone, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
  5. Gangadeen v. RomanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API