Legal Opinion
Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland v. Goldman & Rio
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Decided February 4, 2002PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
Order dated November 14, 2000 modified to grant partial summary judgment to plaintiff on the issue of liability only and to remand the matter for a hearing on the issue of damages; as modified, order affirmed, without costs.
Appeal from order denying reargument entered March 22, 2001 dismissed, without costs, as taken from a nonappealahle order.
Defendants, a law firm and its two principals, applied for and procured an appeal bond in connection with an ultimately unsuccessful appeal from an adverse monetary judgment entered against them, as stakeholders, in a prior lawsuit…
3Cases cited4 opinions
- Held v. KaufmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1998
- Braten v. Bankers Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Tonkonogy v. SeidenbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
- Urban Court Reporting, Inc. v. DavisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
4Cited by2 opinions
- Trina Solar US, Inc. v. Jasmin Solar Pty LtdCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2020
- Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland v. GoldmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003