Weil v. Commissioner
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Per curiam
Affirmed on authority of Southern Abstract & Loan Co. v. Commissioner, 72 F.2d 130 (C.C.A.6). See, also, Massachusetts Mutual Life Ins. Co. v. United States, 288 U.S. 269, 273, 53 S.Ct. 337, 77 L.Ed. ,739; Moran v. Commissioner, 67 F.2d 601, (C.C.A.1) ; Commissioner v. Moore, 48 F.2d 526, for principles applicable. There was no error in refusing to receive amended return, since proofs thereunder, if made, would result in duplication of deductions. It is so ordered.
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. MooreCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1931
- Moran v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1933
- Southern Abstract & Loan Co. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1934
3Cited by2 opinions
- Commissioner of Internal Rev. v. Laguna Land & W. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1941
- Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. George M. Jones Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1945