Legal Opinion

Sullivan v. Murphy

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided August 22, 2003No. Nos. 37,473-CA, 37,474-CAPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

h STEWART, J.

Rachel Medlin (“Medlin”) and Francis Sullivan (“Sullivan”) brought suit against the State of Louisiana through the Department of Public Safety and Corrections (“State”), as employer of State Trooper G.J. Pleasant (“Trooper Pleasant”), and Harold Murphy (“Murphy”) and his employer, Richmond Automotive, for injuries arising out of an automobile accident. Murphy and Richmond settled with the plaintiffs before trial. After a trial on the merits, the jury rendered a verdict in favor of the plaintiffs. The jury allocated fault 80% to Medlin, 15% to Trooper Pleasant, and 5% to Murphy.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Rosell v. EscoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1989
  2. Syrie v. SchilhabSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1997
  3. Boykin v. Louisiana Transit Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1998
  4. Blair v. TynesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1993
  5. Monceaux v. Jennings Rice Drier, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1991

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Langhoff v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2011
  2. Anthony Johnson v. Allstate Insurance Company and Ebonie Aejah CambreDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2026
  3. Nathan Putman, Pamela Putman, Jimmy Putman, and Kyle Jones v. Scott Dalton Costello and Shelter Mutual Insurance CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API