Legal Opinion

People v. Scott

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 2, 2001No. Appeal No. 1PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant has failed to preserve for our review his contention that County Court erred in imposing an enhanced sentence (see, People v Martinez, 278 AD2d 818; see also, People v Coutts, 277 AD2d 1029; People v Michael S., 273 AD2d 804, 804-805). In any event, defendant “ ‘received the precise sentence for which he bargained’ ” (People v Martinez, supra, quoting People v Mayers, 74 NY2d 931, 932). (Appeal from Judgment of Monroe County Court, Egan, J. — Grand Larceny, 3rd Degree.) Present — Pine, J. P., Hayes, Wisner, Kehoe and Burns, JJ.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. MayersNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
  2. People v. Michael S.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  3. People v. CouttsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  4. People v. MartinezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. ScottAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001