Maria Isabel Giraldo v. Agency for Health Care Administration
Supreme Court of Florida
1Opinion of the CourtLawson, J.
We accepted review of the decision of the First District Court of Appeal in Giraldo v. Agency for Health Care Administration , 208 So.3d 244 (Fla. 1st DCA 2016), on the ground that it expressly and directly conflicts with the Second District Court of Appeal's decision in Willoughby v. Agency for Health Care Administration , 212 So.3d 516 (Fla. 2d DCA 2017), regarding whether the Agency for Health Care Administration (AHCA) may lien the future medical expenses portion of a Florida Medicaid recipient's tort recovery. We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const. For the reasons that…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Holly v. AuldSupreme Court of Florida · 1984
- Arkansas Department of Health & Human Services v. AhlbornSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- A. R. Douglass, Inc. v. McRainey, as Admrx.Supreme Court of Florida · 1931
- Borden v. East-European Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 2006
- Wos v. E. M. A. Ex Rel. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Gallardo v. MarstillerSupreme Court of the United States · 2022
- Gianinna Gallardo v. Mary MayhewCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2020
- Latham v. Recovery ServicesUtah Supreme Court · 2019
- State of Florida, Agency for Health Care Administration v. Michael Lee Smathers, IIDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019
- Wiesenmayer v. VasporyOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.