Legal Opinion

State v. Kenneth Erickson

Montana Supreme Court

Decided November 18, 2014No. DA 13-0312PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McKINNON

¶1 The State charged Kenneth Erickson in the Twelfth Judicial District Court, Hill County, with aggravated assault or, in the alternative, criminal endangerment. Erickson gave notice that he would rely on the affirmative defense of justifiable use of force. A three-day jury trial was held in February 2013. At the close of the State’s case-in-chief, Erickson moved to dismiss on the ground that the State had not presented sufficient evidence to prove that he was not justified in his use of force. The District Court denied the motion. The jury ultimately found Erickson guilty of criminal…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. LaMereMontana Supreme Court · 2000
  2. State v. RoslingMontana Supreme Court · 2008
  3. State v. BieberMontana Supreme Court · 2007
  4. State v. DanielsMontana Supreme Court · 2011
  5. State v. RobbinsMontana Supreme Court · 1998

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State v. KaarmaMontana Supreme Court · 2017
  2. State v. L. AkersMontana Supreme Court · 2017
  3. State v. PolakMontana Supreme Court · 2018
  4. State v. J. LackmanMontana Supreme Court · 2017
  5. State v. BowenMontana Supreme Court · 2015

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API