Legal Opinion

United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Wickline

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided July 16, 1919No. 21010PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from the district court for Lancaster county: Frederick E. Shepherd, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Morrissey, C. J..

This cause is here for the second time. It is first reported in United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Wickline, ante, p. 21. A second trial has been had, and from the judgment entered both parties appeal.

It is said in the brief of plaintiff: “The sole issue in the case is whether or not Mrs. Wickline, by refusing to submit to a medical examination, including the taking of an X-ray picture, brought herself within the provisions-of section 3675, Rev. St. 1913, which provides that refusal to submit to a medical examination shall bar the right to compensation.” We shall…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Lewis v. Allied Contractors, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Burns v. Aetna Life InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Duprey v. WagerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1982
  4. Cain v. Industrial Commission of ColoradoSupreme Court of Colorado · 1957
  5. Cain v. Industrial Commission of ColoradoSupreme Court of Colorado · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API