Legal Opinion

Superville v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 29, 1994No. 94-1228PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MICKLE, Judge.

The order of the trial court adjudging appellant guilty of direct criminal contempt is reversed upon the authority of Harris v. United States, 382 U.S. 162, 86 S.Ct. 352, 15 L.Ed.2d 240 (1965) and Pendley v. State, 392 So.2d 321 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980), and the cause is remanded for further proceedings consistent -with Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.840. Upon remand, should appellant be convicted of indirect criminal contempt, the maximum penalty imposed without trial by jury shall not exceed six months’ imprisonment. Martinez v. State, 339 So.2d 1133 (Fla. 2d DCA 1976),…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Harris v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Martinez v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1976
  3. Butler v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1976
  4. Pendley v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. McCrimager v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API