Legal Opinion

City of Austin v. Villegas

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided July 10, 1980No. 8502PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KEITH, Justice.

The question presented in this case is the sufficiency of the allegations in an order of indefinite suspension of a city police officer by the Chief of Police. The cause arises under the provisions of §§ 16, 17, and 18 of Tex.Rev.Civ.Stat.Ann. art. 1269m (1963 and Supp. 1980).

At all times material to this suit, plaintiff was a policeman in the City of Austin and his tenure was governed by the provisions of the civil service statute noted above. On March 23,1979, he was served with a letter of indefinite suspension signed by the Chief of Police and he duly gave notice of appeal…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Fire Department v. City of Fort WorthTexas Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Richardson v. City of PasadenaTexas Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Firemen's & Policemen's Civil Service Commission v. HammanTexas Supreme Court · 1966
  4. City of San Antonio v. PoulosTexas Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Richardson v. City of PasadenaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1973

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Firemen's & Policemen's Civil Service Commission v. LockhartTexas Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Plaster v. City of Houston, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1986
  3. Juneth Steubing v. City of Killeen, Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2009
  4. Juneth Steubing v. City of Killeen, Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2009
  5. Plaster v. City of HoustonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1986

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API