Legal Opinion
G.K. v. D.M.
District Court, E.D. Louisiana
Decided March 20, 2024No. 2:21-cv-02242Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA G.K. * CIVIL ACTION VERSUS * NO. 21-2242 D.M. * SECTION “T” (2) ORDER AND REASONS Before me is Intervenors Fishman Haygood, LLP and its attorneys Michael Dodson, Danielle Teutonico, and Monica Bergeron’s Motion to Compel. ECF No. 286. Plaintiff G.K. timely filed an Opposition, entitled “Objections.” ECF No. 289. Intervenors filed a Reply. ECF No. 290. No party requested oral argument in accordance with Local Rule 78.1, and the court agrees that oral argument is unnecessary. Having considered the record, the submissions and arguments…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Fisher v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- McLeod Alexander, Powel & Apffel, P.C. v. Fred H. QuarlesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
- Hearn v. RhayDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 1975
- United States of America and Revenue Agents Clarence H. Isabel and John S. Reid of the Internal Revenue Service v. The El Paso CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.