Legal Opinion

Ayers v. Fay

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 26, 1940No. 29044PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRiley, J.

This action was commenced April 6, 1937, by James E. Ayers, administrator de bonis non of the estate of Elizabeth A. Stanley, deceased, of Washington, Vt. Ayers alleged defendant’s testator, Roy Fay, was one and the same person as William E. Snow, who was appointed administrator of the estate of Elizabeth A. Stanley, on March 31, 1933, and served as such until October 6,1935, at which time he absconded with assets of the estate in excess of $20,000. Ayers sought to impress a trust upon certain bank accounts and other property in Fay’s possession at his death, on the theory the bank accounts…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Massey v. FisherU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania · 1894
  2. Noble v. NobleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Mitchell v. DunnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Apple v. HertSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
  5. Bilby v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Hurst v. HurstCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1965
  2. In Re Seneca Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
  3. United States Department of Energy v. Seneca Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
  4. Bistate Oil Co. v. Heston Oil Co. (In Re Heston Oil Co.)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1986
  5. Boroughs v. WhitleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API