Legal Opinion
Bosch v. Hajjar
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided July 20, 1994No. 92-3575, 93-1171PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
639 So.2d 1096 (1994)
Oneila BOSCH and Jose Bosch, Appellants,
v.
Daniel G. HAJJAR, D.D.S., Appellee.
Nos. 92-3575, 93-1171.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
July 20, 1994.
Frederick C. Morello of Frederick C. Morello, P.A., Daytona Beach, for appellants.
Shelley H. Leinicke of Wicker, Smith, Tutan, O'Hara, McCoy, Graham & Lane, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.
2Per curiam
We affirm the trial court's denial of appellants' motion for new trial, but reverse the award of attorney's fee to appellee.
While we have considered and rejected both of appellants' arguments directed to the motion for…
3Cases cited12 opinions
- White v. New Hampshire Department of Employment SecuritySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- William Knighton, Cross-Appellant v. John C. Watkins, Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- Morris Obin v. District No. 9 of the International Association of MacHinists and Aerospace Workers Anheuser-Busch, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1981
- Borden, Inc. v. YoungDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
- Silva v. NightingaleDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by3 opinions
- Barrero v. Ocean BankDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
- Bodek v. Gulliver Academy, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
- Olbek v. KrautDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995