Legal Opinion

Sheriff v. Chumphol

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided December 11, 1979No. 12302PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

On September 25, 1979, respondent filed a pretrial petition for a writ of habeas corpus. The petition did not contain the consent required by NRS 34.375(l)(b)(3). Such a petition may not be considered. NRS 34.375(1); 34.380(4)(a). In addition, the petition was not verified as required by NRS 34.370(3). An unverified petition for a writ of habeas corpus is not cognizable. Sheriff v. Arvey, 93 Nev. 72, 560 P.2d 153 (1977). Nevertheless, the district court granted the petition, and the state has appealed.

We do not reach the merits of the appeal. The habeas petition was not cognizable in…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Sheriff, Clark County v. TostonNevada Supreme Court · 1977
  2. SHERIFF, CLARK CTY. v. ArveyNevada Supreme Court · 1977

4Cited by3 opinions

  1. Miles v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Lewis v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1980
  3. Sheriff v. MarshallNevada Supreme Court · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API