Legal Opinion

Sewall v. Wood

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided February 21, 1905No. 34PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania.

1Opinion of the Court

GRAY, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from the District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, in a cause of contract civil and maritime. On or about the 16th day of February, 1901, the libel-ants were under a contract with the Dutch government, in the Island of Java, to supply 3,4411007/224o tons of iron pipe, to be delivered to said government in Java not later than the 30th day of November, 1901. The ordinary voyage from Philadelphia to Java, by sail, is about five months. Being under said contract, the libelants, through their brokers, Haldt & Cummins, of Philadelphia, sought to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Clydesdale Shipowners' Co. v. William W. Brauer S. S. Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1903
  2. Wilfred v. MyersDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1889

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Gallaspy v. A. J. Ingersoll & Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1920
  2. Mengel Co. v. RazianoLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1952
  3. Civello v. Equinix IncorporatedDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2025
  4. Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion, Texas Attorney General Reports1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API