Lehman v. District of Columbia
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
In error to the Police Court of the District of Columbia. The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Morris
Information was filed in the police court of the District of Columbia against the plaintiff in error on March 6, 1901, for alleged violation of the act of Congress of March 3, 1893, regulating the sale of intoxicating liquors in the District. The first count charged him with the sale of intoxicating liquors on Sunday; and the second count, with keeping Ms barroom open on the same day. On trial before a jury, verdict was rendered against him on both counts; and he then filed motions for a new trial and in arrest of judgment. Both motions were overruled, and sentence was pronounced against him;…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Claassen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Northern Pacific Railroad v. BabcockSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Aetna Life Ins. Co. v. WardSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Hicks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- People v. RobyMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Brown v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1949
- Kinard v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1938
- Baer v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1962
- People v. SánchezSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1940
- United States v. George F. VasenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1955
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.