Anderson v. Burdick Grain Co.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WOZNIAK, Judge.
Burdick Grain Co. appeals from the denial of its motions for judgment n.o.v. or for new trial. It contends that the court erred by submitting an instruction on res ipsa loquitur to the jury. The jury found that Burdick’s negligence was a direct cause of the elevator fire resulting in damage to the plaintiff’s property. We affirm.
FACTS
Plaintiffs are residents of St. Louis Park in the vicinity of Burdick Grain Co. On May 11, 1977 an explosion in a Burdick elevator damaged their property. Several neighborhood witnesses heard or saw the elevator explode. Some testified that…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Sweeney v. ErvingSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Kleinman v. Banner Laundry Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
- Jones v. FleischhackerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- Rinkel v. Lee's Plumbing & Heating Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
- Keithley v. HettingerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Spinett, Inc. v. Peoples Natural Gas Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986