Legal Opinion · Dissent

Bingham v. C & L Electric Cooperative

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided April 15, 2015No. CV-13-969Published

1DissentBart F. Virden, Judge

I must respectfully dissent. The appel-lee and defendant below, C & L Electric, initially requested that this case be heard by a jury. Thereafter, C & L filed a motion for summary judgment alleging that there were no material facts to be decided by a jury sitting as fact-finder, and its motion was granted by the trial court.

On appeal, we review the appropriateness of a summary judgment based on whether the evidentiary items presented by the moving party leave a material fact unanswered. Wilcox v. Wooley, 2015 Ark. App. 56, 454 S.W.3d 792. We view the evidence in the light most favorable to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bomar v. MoserSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2007
  2. Horton v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2012
  3. Reynolds v. GFM, LLCCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2013
  4. Reynolds v. GFM LLCCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2013
  5. Wilcox v. WooleyCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API