Legal Opinion

Mullen v. McDonald

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided March 16, 1897PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Case 13 — AGREED CASE 1. The legislature in providing that the first ward of the city of Louisville, shall he one legislative district; that the second and third ward shall he one, and so on, manifestly intended that the territory embracing these districts should follow any change in the wards of the city, which the municipal authorities were empowered to make. 1. The Constitution has conferred upon the legislature the right to divide the city into' legislative districts,…

Read the full summary

Case 13 — AGREED CASE 1. The legislature in providing that the first ward of the city of Louisville, shall he one legislative district; that the second and third ward shall he one, and so on, manifestly intended that the territory embracing these districts should follow any change in the wards of the city, which the municipal authorities were empowered to make. 1. The Constitution has conferred upon the legislature the right to divide the city into' legislative districts, and prescribe when and how the apportionment shall be made, and this right is vested wholly in the legislature, and can…

1Opinion of the Court

JUDGE DuRELLE

delivebep the opinion oe the doubt.

This was an agreed case, tried before the chancery division of the Jefferson Circuit Court.

Appellee was elected a member of the Louisville School Board at the November, 1896, election by the voters of the Seventh Legislative District of the county of Jefferson. The statute provides that the members of that board shall be elected two from each legislative district. (Section 2949, Kentucky Statutes.) $

The act adopted by the general assembly at the session of 1891-2-3 provided for the creation of one hundred representative districts, the. Fiftieth…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Webb v. WebbCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1923
  2. Louisville & N. R. R. v. S. D. Chestnut & Bro.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1903
  3. Pittsburg, C. C. & St. L. Ry. Co. v. ViersCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1902
  4. Thomas v. Frankfort & Cincinnati Ry. Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1903
  5. Hartley v. St. Louis, Keokuk & North Western RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1902

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API