Legal Opinion

In Re Nominating Petition of Williams

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 25, 2009No. 506 C.D. 2009PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

Judge SMITH-RIBNER.

R. Seth Williams, a candidate for the Office of Philadelphia District Attorney in the May 2009 Democratic Primary Election, has appealed to this Court from the March 27, 2009 order of the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County that granted objections filed by John O’Rourke and Jason Stein (Objectors) to Williams’ nominating petition and ordered the Philadelphia County Board of Elections not to place Williams’ name on the primary ballot. After oral argument in this matter, the Court entered a per curiam order on April 8, 2009 sustaining the appeal of Williams…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. In Re Nomination of PaulmierSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  2. In Re Nomination of FlahertySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  3. In Re Nomination Petition of CarrollSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  4. In Re BenninghoffSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  5. Humphreys v. DeRossSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re: The Nomination Papers of David Amato as Candidate for Member of Council Borough of West Reading ~ Appeal of: Oswald Herbert and Suzanne ThompsonCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  2. In Re: The Nomination Papers of David Amato as Candidate for Member of Council Borough of West Reading ~ Appeal of: Oswald Herbert and Suzanne ThompsonCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  3. In Re: The Nomination Papers of David Amato as Candidate for Member of Council Borough of West Reading ~ Appeal of: Oswald Herbert and Suzanne ThompsonCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API