Boehs v. Hanger
New Jersey Court of Chancery
On Lili lor annulment oí marriage.
1Opinion of the Court
Magie, Chancellor.
By her bill complainant seeks a decree annulling the marriage between her and the defendant.
The defendant not having interposed any defence, a reference of the matter to a special master was made under rule 165&. *11The special master has sent up the proofs taken before him, with his opinion that said proofs are insufficient to justify a decree declaring the marriage between the parties null and void. The cause has been brought to hearing upon the bill, proofs and report, to which exceptions were filed.
It is now argued that the master’s opinion was erroneous, and that upon the…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Wells v. TalhamWisconsin Supreme Court · 1923
- Oswald v. OswaldCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1924
- Wolfe v. WolfeAppellate Court of Illinois · 1978
- Rhoades v. RhoadesNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1950
- Wolfe v. WolfeAppellate Court of Illinois · 1978
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.