Legal Opinion

Diel v. Diel

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 2, 1941No. Docket No. 26, Calendar No. 41,514PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBoyles, J.

This is a proceeding in chancery for partition of certain real estate, and for an accounting of rentals claimed to be due from the defendant. The circuit judge entered a decree for sale of the premises in partition under the statute ; and further provided that defendant pay over the sum of $2,022.63 found to be due from him for rentals, and that it be charged against the defendant’s share of the proceeds of the sale in partition. Defendant does not question that part of the decree for partition, but appeals on the ground that the decree for payment of money is not justified by the facts.

Plaint…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. MacKenzie v. Union Guardian Trust Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Powell v. PennockMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Porter v. LongMichigan Supreme Court · 1900

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Fowler v. CornwellMichigan Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Bernstein v. WilkinsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Vander Honing v. TaylorMichigan Supreme Court · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API