Legal Opinion

Moss v. Jack

California Supreme Court

Decided May 9, 1907No. Sac. No. 1349PublishedCited by 1 opinion

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Buck & Middlecoff, and Thomas S. Louttit, for Appellant.

1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.

This is an action in equity to have a certain assignment and deed executed by plaintiff to defendant set aside, as having been fraudulently procured, and to recover from defendant the sum of fifteen thousand dollars for moneys and property of the plaintiff obtained by defendant under this deed and assignment. The trial resulted in findings .wholly exonerating the defendant from the charges and imputations of fraud, and judgment followed the findings in defendant’s favor.

The essential facts are the following: Plaintiff is a son, heir, and devisee of William S. Moss, deceased. Upon his death…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Percival v. JackCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1906

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API