Legal Opinion
Landau v. Rosenbaum
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided October 5, 1951PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
15 N.J. Super. 524 (1951)
83 A.2d 732
SAM LANDAU AND DAVID COHN, PLAINTIFFS,
v.
IRVING ROSENBAUM, MITCHELL ROSENBAUM, MORRIS ROSENBAUM AND RO-GLO & CO., INC., A BODY CORPORATE, DEFENDANTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division.
Decided October 5, 1951.
Mr. David Cohn (Mr. Samuel A. Wiener, of counsel), attorney for plaintiffs.
Messrs. Cole, Morrill & Nadell, attorneys for defendants.
GRIMSHAW, J.S.C.
The events leading up to the present controversy are as follows:
In the early summer of 1948, the defendant Irving Rosenbaum, then president of Fairtex Glass Manufacturing Company, a New Jersey…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Gluck v. Rynda Development Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1926
- Gluck v. Rynda Development Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1927
- Rice v. BarringtonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1908
- Wolosin v. IavaroneSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1933
- Pignone v. BrooksSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1938
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Batka, Francis J. v. Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
- Samuel B. Slaughter, Jr. v. The Philadelphia National Bank v. Peoples National Bank of Camden CountyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1969
- HUNGERFORD & TERRY, INC. v. GeschwindtNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1953