Adams Oil, Gas & Development Co. v. Hivick
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Carter County; W. E. Freeman, Judge. Action between the Adams Oil, Gas & Development Company and L. C. I-Iivick and others. Judgment for the latter, and, from an order overruling its motion for a new trial, the former brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
POPE, C.
In this case the plaintiff in error, the Adams Oil, Gas & Development Company, against which a judgment had been rendered in the district court of Carter county, filed a motion for a new trial under section 5033, subsec. 9, Rev. Laws 1910, which authorizes a new trial, “when, .without fault of the complaining party, it becomes impossible to make case-made.”
The trial court overruled this motion, and the company brings error. Resolving every question of evidence in favor of plaintiff in error, the facts are as follows: The time for serving a case-made expired at midnight on…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Powell v. Mutual Life Insurance Co. of New YorkIllinois Supreme Court · 1924
- Ramsey v. Old Colony Life InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1921
- Oklahoma Union Ry. Co. v. DascusSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
- Abraham v. Roland Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
- Franklin v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.