Legal Opinion

Schnitzer v. Fox

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided March 15, 1900Published

Appeal from a judgment entered in favor of the plaintiff, upon. a verdict directed by the court, and from an order of the Special.' Term, denying a motion for leave to serve an amended answer.

1Opinion of the Court

O’Dwyer, I.

This is an appeal from a judgment entered upon •a verdict directed by the court in favor of the plaintiff. The action was brought to recover $250, on an undertaking on attachment, as damages sustained by reason of the issuance and levy of a warrant of attachment thereon issued. The answer pleaded substantially a general denial. The cause was placed on the calendar, and upon motion thereafter it was placed upon the calendar for the trial of short causes. The defendants made a motion to amend their answer, a few days before the trial, by pleading a judgment recovered in the City…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Tuttle v. RobinsonNew York Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Hamerschlag v. Cathoscope Electrical Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897
  3. Hamerschlag v. Cathoscope Electrical Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API