Legal Opinion

Brooks v. Williams

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 16, 1972No. 47449PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Deen, Judge.

While it is elementary that after a notice of appeal has been filed to a judgment of the trial court the judge no longer has jurisdiction to reconsider and change it, this has no bearing on extraordinary motions filed under Code § 70-204. The court had jurisdiction to consider intrinsic evidence pertaining to the manner in which the trial was conducted which had come to light between the filing of the notice of appeal and the docketing of the case in this court, and the point is properly made through the medium of an enumeration of error on the denial of the extraordinary motion.…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Tallent v. McKelveyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
  2. McLendon v. FloydCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1939
  3. Taylor v. RobersonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
  4. Davis v. Camp Concrete Products Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1970

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Beal v. BrauneckerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
  2. Petroleum Carrier Corp. v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
  3. Bales v. SheltonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1990
  4. Mercer v. BraswellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
  5. Jones v. Petroleum Carrier Corp. of FloridaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API